Friday, March 24, 2006

Dissertation - Racism in British Tabloids (Selected Chapters)

by Ismaeel Nakhuda 2nd June 2004

Dissertation title:
In recent times the British tabloid press has claimed to report news which is unbiased. Investigate such a claim and discuss whether a racist attitude has been adopted in the coverage of recent international events.

Date of Submission: 2nd June 2004
Degree: Journalism & Linguistics (BA Combined Honours)

This dissertation is submitted in part fulfilment of the requirements of the Journalism and Linguistics BA Honours degree in the Department of Journalism at the University of Central Lancashire

Abstract
Recently, the British Isles has been the destination for many political and economic migrants; consequently the issues of asylum and terrorism have become topics widely covered in relation to migration by all sections of the media

This paper presents the results of an interdisciplinary study on tabloid press coverage of ethnic affairs in the UK. Apart from providing the reader with a thorough content analysis of the material, the study introduces a detailed discourse analytical approach to the study of the ways in which ethnic minorities are portrayed in the press.

The study focuses on two UK tabloids, The Daily Mirror and The Daily Mail, each representing the left and the right. The author has intended that by prioritising these two papers an overall general attitude of British tabloids may be determined.

In conclusion the author notes that negative themes such as terrorism, crime, abduction, drugs, violence etc are abundantly reported and magnified in relation to subordinate groups. According to the paper this is something that is most typical in prejudiced racist literature.

The study further concludes that the tabloids are also more likely to define people by race. The study asserts that there is a high probability that one third of all actors featuring in news articles would be defined by race; the majority of which would be from ethnic minorities.

Overall it is found that the right-wing press predominantly portrays race issues negatively, where as the left-wing press is rather more balanced in its’ attitude towards ethnic minorities.

Chapter One (Introduction)

On the 2nd of February 1900, a British liner carrying refugees from Russia moored at Southampton. The Daily Mail, bastion of true-blue-British values, reported, ‘there were all kinds of Jews, all manner of Jews. They had breakfasted on board, but they rushed as though starving at the food. They helped themselves at will, they spilled coffee on the ground in wanton waste’. The Daily Mail continued, ‘they fought, they jostled to the foremost places at the gangways. When the Relief Committee passed by they hid their gold and fawned and whined in broken English asked for money for their train fare.’

On Holocaust Memorial Day in 1938, regarding Jewish refugees fleeing Nazi persecution to Britain, The Daily Mail said: “The way stateless Jews from Germany are pouring in from every port of this country is becoming an outrage, the number of aliens entering the country through the back door is­ a problem to which the Daily Mail has repeatedly pointed.’

In recent times, the British Isles has again been the destination for many political and economic migrants wishing to take up home. In relation to this, the issue of asylum and terrorism has become a topic widely covered by all sectors of the media.

This paper aims to indulge in seeking to clarify whether British tabloid newspapers have covered recent issues in an unbiased, impartial manner or whether on the other hand a racist, biased attitude, similarly to the one that was adopted at the time of the arrival of Jewish migrants over a hundred years ago, has been adopted.

The year 2003 has most certainly been an eventful year. To begin with, in April the invasion of Iraq and the subsequent second Gulf War began. Prior to this issues regarding Weapons of Mass Destruction, terrorism and refugees featured greatly in the British press.

In January a chemical substance thought to be ricin was found in the possession of ‘Algerian asylum seekers’ in London. A discussion began regarding the presence of ‘Algerian terrorists’ in the British Isles posing as asylum seekers. As the debate on refugees began to take swing, an Algerian refugee stabbed Manchester policeman Stephen Oake to death on January the 15th.

Six days later on the 21st of January, police raided the Finsbury Park Mosque; consequently the raid drew Abu Hamza, dubbed ‘Captain Hook’ by some of the tabloids, into the media limelight.

This paper aims to choose a collection of tabloid articles from the period between 1st January and 30th of February 2003 and see whether a racist attitude has been adopted in the coverage of recent events. If such an assumption can be found to be true then the paper will further analyse the manner by which such discrimination manifests itself.

After having set the background for this study, chapter two aims to present a brief review of the literature studied and used in the writing of this analysis. Moving further on, chapter three will contain an outline of the methodology adopted in researching the issue, thereafter the actual analysis will be undertaken in chapters four and five. Chapter four will be concerned with an analysis of the articles through the quantitative mode whereas chapter five will focus on analysing the articles in a qualitative manner. Finally the conclusion will be presented in chapter six.

Chapter Five (Conclusion)

This study has extensively analysed British tabloids in ascertaining whether a racist attitude has been adopted in the coverage of recent events. Combining a mixture of discourse and content analysis the final results have been interesting.

All of the UK tabloids, except The Mirror, are right wing. By selecting The Mail and The Mirror results from this study have been reflective of the overall attitude of British tabloids in general.

Previous studies concluded that in the 60’s the primary concern of the press was with keeping ethnic minorities out. Issues pertaining to immigration and the views of right-wing hardliners such as Enoch Powell were given excessive coverage (Hartmann, Husband & Clark 1974, p. 174). Subsequent studies analysing coverage in the 1970’s found there had been “a shift of concern” and that ethnic minorities were seen in the press as “the outsider within.” (see Troyna 1981, p41).

In this paper, having analysed news articles we find that at the beginning of the 21st century tabloids from the right have, as in the 1960’s, aimed at keeping refugees out and portrays them as a problem. As before much coverage is given to immigration and the views of hard-line politicians are given substantial coverage with white liberals and ethnic minorities belittled and criticised.

On the contrary, the left shuns hardliners and portrays the positive aspects of immigration. The question whether such attitudes are on account of traditional political attitudes and sympathies is an issue, which has a great probability. But fundamentally we can say that The Mail and the tabloids in general, supports and endorses draconian measures against ‘dominated’ groups where as the left does not do so.

In his study Van Dijk found that the coverage of race related issues in European societies has “become lees blatantly racist, but that stereotypes and the definition of minorities as a ‘problem’ or even as a threat is still prevalent”. (see Van Dijk:1991 p.245)

Van Dijk’s findings can also be considered to be true in relation to the results of this study. Using headlines, layouts and metaphors, the tabloids portray minority ethnic communities and asylum seekers as being different and also a threat to British society.

Coverage of race issues in the right is most definitely representative of, as Bell says, the Dominant view. Information regarding dominated groups is scarcely covered positively but rather in a hegemonic manner. We see ‘the others’ stereotyped and marginalized with positive images excluded from gaining substantial coverage in the papers.

Negative themes such as terrorism, crime, abduction, drugs, violence etc are abundantly reported and magnified in relation to subordinate groups, something, which is most typical in prejudiced racist literature.

The tabloids are also more likely to define people by race, with a high probability of one third of actors featuring in news articles defined by race; with the majority of such actors being from ethnic minorities.

Although the quantitative analysis found that people from the Middle East are more likely to have their race mentioned, and that this is probably due to the fact that the news articles selected for this paper have been terrorist orientated, fundamentally we do find that there is an attitude in the tabloids of associating terrorism with Middle Eastern people.

Alarmingly those covertly or overtly defined by faith tend to be Muslim. This is the attitude across the left and the right and could be assumed to be the attitude amongst tabloids in general. As mentioned before if an analysis of articles were to be done from a period such as the Irish marching season then we would be sure to find a greater reference to Christian religious denominations. Nevertheless the results developed from the above table supports claims by the anti-Islamaphobia lobby that post 9/11, newspapers (especially the tabloids) have adopted an Islamaphobic approach in demonising the Muslim faith.

Ethnic minorities are also minimally heard or presented as sources of information. This is worrying and implies that there is an assumption in the press that ethnic minorities are not credible sources of information or on the other hand there is a lack of mistrust of the press amongst ethnic communities.

From the above it can be seen that in general there has been a bias attitude in the coverage of recent events in the tabloids. Having said that it would be incorrect to assume that the tabloid media is the only profession guilty of racism. Journalists should be criticised for their irresponsibility, but the media is not the only profession where in which racism is found.

6 Comments:

At 23/12/09 18:56, Blogger Ismaeel Nakhuda said...

Thanks. Who are you?

 
At 9/8/10 19:27, Blogger Unknown said...

Hiya Ismaeel. I was wondering if I could possibly have a read of your literature review for this dissertation. I'm currently exploring topics for my dissertation and am keen on having a look at the literature u focused on.

 
At 9/8/10 19:29, Blogger Ismaeel Nakhuda said...

Send me your email and I'll send it you.

 
At 3/9/10 16:48, Anonymous Affordable Dissertation Writing Service said...

Your blog is really helps for my search and amazingly it was on my searching criteria.. Thanks a lot..

 
At 11/10/10 16:29, Anonymous Dissertation Abstract said...

Very informative and helpful. I was searching for this information but there are very limited resources. Thank you for providing this information

buy dissertation

 
At 24/11/10 15:32, Anonymous Dissertation Editing Services said...

your post is good. . let me tell u one thing that Blogs have become latest and important source of quality free information on net people enjoying for hours together. . .nice job keep sharing ;)

Dissertation Editing Services

 

Post a Comment

<< Home